Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Droxidopa (Northera) approved (Feb 2014)

For orthostatic hypotension.
Similar warnings like Midodrine.
Link to this news

Age at surgery: For D-TGA


JACC 2014:63:407-16
Objectives  This study sought to examine the impact of surgical timing on major morbidity and hospital reimbursement for late preterm and term infants with dextrotransposition of the great arteries (d-TGA).
Background  Neonatal arterial switch operation is the standard of care for d-TGA. Little is known about the effects of age at operation on clinical outcomes or costs for these neonates.
Methods  We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants at ≥36 weeks' gestation, with d-TGA, with or without ventricular septal defects, admitted to our institution at 5 days of age or younger, between January 1, 2003 and October 1, 2012. Children with other cardiac abnormalities or other major comorbid conditions were excluded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the effects of age at operation on major morbidity and hospital reimbursement.
Results  A total of 140 infants met inclusion criteria. Reimbursement data were available for them through January 1, 2012 (n = 128). The mortality rate was 1.4% (n = 2). Twenty percent (n = 28) experienced a major morbidity. The median costs were $60,000, in 2012 dollars (range: $25,000 to $549,000). The median age at operation was 5 days (range: 1 to 12 days). For every day later that surgery was performed, beyond day of life 3, the odds of major morbidity increased by 47% (range: 23% to 66%, p < 0.001) and costs increased by 8% (range: 5% to 11%, p < 0.001), after considering the effects of sex, birth weight, gestational age, year at which surgery was performed, transfer, weekend admission, insurance, surgeon, septostomy, bypass and cross-clamp times, and the presence of ventricular septal defects or abnormal coronary anatomy.
Conclusions  Delay of neonatal arterial switch operation beyond 3 days is significantly associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs.

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Monitoring for brain injury during ECMO



Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a brain injury biomarker in children undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Bembea, MM, Savage W, Strouse JJ, et al.

Patients age 1 day-18 years who required ECMO from April 2008 to August 2009 were studied. 
GFAP was measured using an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay developed at Johns Hopkins. Control samples were collected from 99 healthy children (0.5-16 years) and 59 NICU infants without neurologic injury. 
In controls, the median GFAP concentration was 0.055 ng/mL (IQR: 0-0.092 ng/mL) and the 95th percentile of GFAP was 0.436ng/mL. 
In ECMO patients, plasma GFAP was measured at 6, 12 and every 24 hours after cannulation. 
We enrolled 22 children who underwent ECMO. Median age was 7 days (IQR, 2 days-9 years), and primary ECMO indication was: cardiac failure, 6/22 (27.3%), respiratory failure, 12/22 (54.5%), ECPR, 3/22 (13.6%), and sepsis, 1/22 (4.6%). Seven of 22 (32%) patients developed acute neurologic injury (intracranial hemorrhage, brain death or cerebral edema diagnosed by imaging). Fifteen of 22 (68%) survived to hospital discharge. 
In the ECMO group, peak GFAP levels were higher in children with brain injury than those without (median, 5.9 vs 0.09ng/mL, p=0.04) and in non-survivors compared to survivors to discharge (median, 5.9 vs 0.09ng/mL, p=0.04). 
The odds ratio (OR) for brain injury for GFAP >0.436ng/mL vs normal was 11.5 (95%CI: 1.3-98.3) and the OR for mortality was 13.6 (95%CI: 1.7-108.5).

Conclusions

High GFAP during ECMO is significantly associated with acute brain injury and death. Brain injury biomarkers may aid in outcome prediction and neurologic monitoring of ECMO patients to improve outcomes and benchmark new therapies.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Adult guidelines (Released online on 11/12/13)

Beware, this is for adults. Pediatric guidelines came out in late 2011.

1) Blood cholesterol therapy
2) Life style management to reduce CV risk
3) Management of overweight adult
3) Assessment of CV risk

Practice Guidelines

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Post-Fontan thrombotic complications

 2013 Jan 22;61(3):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1023. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

Factors associated with thrombotic complications after the Fontan procedure: a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized trial of primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure.

Source

Labatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. brian.mccrindle@sickkids.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The study sought to identify factors associated with increased risk of thrombosis after Fontan.

BACKGROUND:

The Fontan procedure is the culmination of staged palliation for patients with univentricular physiology. Thrombosis is an important complication after this procedure.

METHODS:

An international multicenter randomized controlled trial of acetylsalicylic acid versus warfarin for thromboprophylaxis after the Fontan procedure was conducted in 111 patients, and did not show a significant difference regarding thrombotic complications. We performed a secondary analysis of this previously published manuscript to identify factors associated with thrombosis in this population. Standardized prospective data collection included independent adjudication of all events.

RESULTS:

At 2.5 years after randomization, time-related freedom from thrombosis was 69% (all venous, no arterial events), with 28% of thrombosis presenting with clinical signs or events. Hazard of thrombosis was highest immediately after Fontan with a gradual increase in risk during late follow-up. In multivariable models, factors associated with higher risk of thrombosis were pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 12.70, p = 0.04), pulmonary artery distortion (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 0.96 to 5.73, p = 0.06), lower pre-operative unconjugated bilirubin (HR: 0.84 μmol/l, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.04), use of central venous lines for >10 days or until hospital discharge (HR: 17.8, 95% CI: 3.97 to 79.30, p < 0.001), and lower FiO(2) 24 h after the procedure (HR: 0.67/10%, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.00, p = 0.06). Patients on warfarin who consistently achieved minimum target international normalized ratio levels or those on acetylsalicylic acid had a decrease in risk of thrombosis compared with patients who often failed to meet target international normalized ratio level (HR: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.35 to 9.20, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

More favorable thromboprophylaxis strategies are needed in light of the difficulties in controlling warfarin therapy and the high prevalence of thrombosis in this population.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Comment in

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Dabigatran vs. Warfarin for Mechanical Heart Valves

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves




BACKGROUND

Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that has been shown to be an effective alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves.

METHODS

In this phase 2 dose-validation study, we studied two populations of patients: those who had undergone aortic- or mitral-valve replacement within the past 7 days and those who had undergone such replacement at least 3 months earlier. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either dabigatran or warfarin. The selection of the initial dabigatran dose (150, 220, or 300 mg twice daily) was based on kidney function. Doses were adjusted to obtain a trough plasma level of at least 50 ng per milliliter. The warfarin dose was adjusted to obtain an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 or 2.5 to 3.5 on the basis of thromboembolic risk. The primary end point was the trough plasma level of dabigatran.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 252 patients because of an excess of thromboembolic and bleeding events among patients in the dabigatran group. In the as-treated analysis, dose adjustment or discontinuation of dabigatran was required in 52 of 162 patients (32%). Ischemic or unspecified stroke occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dabigatran group and in no patients in the warfarin group; major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (4%) and 2 patients (2%), respectively. All patients with major bleeding had pericardial bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves was associated with increased rates of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, as compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and an excess risk. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01452347 and NCT01505881.)